From mark@kli.org Fri Aug 24 15:57:29 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: mark@kli.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 24 Aug 2001 22:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31755 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 22:57:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2001 22:57:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n27.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.135) by mta1 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 22:57:29 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: mark@kli.org Received: from [10.1.2.55] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2001 22:57:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 22:57:25 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o) Message-ID: <9m6m4l+ac90@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 489 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 162.33.229.2 From: mark@kli.org { dang, I always forget to change the To: line to the list at large } --- In lojban@y..., "Jorge Llambias" wrote: > > la pycyn cusku di'e > > >Still, how do I say "mine"? > > {memimoi} > > See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/7014 > and ensuing discussion. I'll have to look this up; I'm not positive what {moi} is doing there. But what's wrong with {steci be mi}? (I think I once used {me mi} ages agone, probably before {me} was worked out) ~mark