From cowan@ccil.org Fri Aug 24 23:45:56 2001
Return-Path: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 25 Aug 2001 06:45:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 19319 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 06:45:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 25 Aug 2001 06:45:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 06:45:55 -0000
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
  id 15aXCr-00062r-00; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 02:46:09 -0400
Subject: Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban]
  si'o)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0108242210140.12707-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu> from
  Nick NICHOLAS at "Aug 24, 2001 10:20:23 pm"
To: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 02:46:09 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15aXCr-00062r-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

Nick NICHOLAS scripsit:
> 
> la pier. ba'o facki la'edi'e:
> 
> > tanru_unit_B_152 : ME_477 sumti_90 MEhU_gap_465 MOI_476
> 
> Oh my God.
> 
> There is only one explanation for this, which is that Lojban Central
> wanted normal sumti, and not just numbers, to be ordinals.

No, no. That was a serendipitous side effect. The point of me+sumti+moi
was to allow full math expressions, not just digit strings, as
numerical selbri. The typical case is me li ny su'i pa mei
'an n+1-some' or me li ny su'i pa moi 'the n+1th'.

> ... I found this in the refgramm; dunno whether it answers my question,
> but it horrifies me even more:
> 
> ***
> 
> It is perfectly possible to use non-numerical sumti after ``me'' and
> before a member of MOI, producing strange results indeed:
> 
> 11.15) le nu mi nolraitru
> cu me le'e snime bolci
> be vi la xel. cu'o
> The event-of me being-a-nobly-superlative-ruler
> has-the-stereotypical snow type-of-ball
> at Hell probability.
> I have a snowball's chance in Hell of being king.

Check out the preceding Example 11.14, which is the normal case.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan

