From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Aug 25 16:08:19 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 25 Aug 2001 23:08:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 43589 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 23:08:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 25 Aug 2001 23:08:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.121) by mta2 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 23:08:17 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:08:14 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.33 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 23:08:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.33] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] useless selmaho? (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 23:08:14 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2001 23:08:14.0301 (UTC) FILETIME=[D16070D0:01C12DBA] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >I agree about JOhI, MAhO and NAhU, not deserving of to be learnt, and I >would add: > >FUhA >BIhE >PEhO Yes, certainly. I missed them. I also missed NUhA. >But I think NIhE and MOhE (and hence TEhU) are potentially *extremely* >useful. Had they not existed, I probably would have been agitating for >them (and persuading noone). Maybe just mo'e. What would you use ni'e for? >As for VUhU, it isn't worthwhile as a selmaho, but some of its members >are worth having, though they could be in PA. One probably can't get >away with learning no members of VUhU (e.g. gei). That's true. There are other selma'o in a similar situation. For example, BIhI should have been in JOI, and GAhO in UI. I have found occasions where I wanted to use GAhO in UI places. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp