From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Aug 25 18:58:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 26 Aug 2001 01:58:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 79009 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 01:58:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 26 Aug 2001 01:58:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 01:58:09 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.255.40.45]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010826015807.LXBH23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:58:07 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: lojban-tech list (was: RE: [lojban] [new] Beginners' mailing list and scheduled IRC Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:57:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" I reiterate my wish for a lojban-tech list. It's beyond dispute that the traffic levels and technicality levels are a burden and a deterrent to a very significant number of potential, current and future subscribers. And as possibly the chief culprit of technicality and, betimes and of late, hightrafficality,=20 I'm a bit fed up of people whingeing about it, even though I fully sympathize with their wish to be rid of the floods of technical postings. So... I have gone ahead and created list jboske@yahoogroups.com, for technical discussion of Lojban. It's there now for anybody to sign up to. I won't use it if strongly urged not to, but my idea is to send all my postings to that list, so people hoping to avoid them can avoid that list, while people wanting technical discussion can subscribe. --And.