From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Aug 26 06:19:22 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 26 Aug 2001 13:19:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 3939 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 13:19:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Aug 2001 13:19:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.63) by mta3 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 13:19:21 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 06:19:21 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.91 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:19:21 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.91] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: mine, etc. Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:19:21 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Aug 2001 13:19:21.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7E6B570:01C12E31] From: "Jorge Llambias" la pycyn cusku di'e >To be sure, every set can be well-ordered (given Choice) but finding the >rule -- as {moi} requests -- is not always easy or even feasible. Is finding the epistemology of knowledge -- as {djuno} requests -- always feasible, let alone easy? mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp