Subject: RE: [lojban] useless selmaho? (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 15:02:59

la and cusku di'e

>Certainly mo'e is the key one.

(ni'e can eventually be done as {mo'e LE}.)

But I'm still not very clear on how to use mo'e.

According to the Codex, {mo'e re ratcu} is the dimensioned number
"two rats". Then {mo'e re da} must be the number "two things",
and {mo'e da} the number "at least one thing" (not just some
number, which would probably be more useful). And {mo'e lo spaji}
would be the dimensioned number "at least one surprise", not some
surprising number.

Is that how you understand it?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp