Subject: Re: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:59:09 +0200

la and. cusku di'e

> What I like about this is firstly that it would settle what lo'e and
> le'e mean:
>
> lo'e gerku (be zo'e)
> = lo(i) ka ce'u gerku zo'e
> = lo(i) ka gerku [under most-favoured proposals]
>
> le'e gerku (be zo'e)
> = le(i) ka ce'u gerku zo'e
> = le(i) ka gerku [under most-favoured proposals]

What is the difference between "le ka gerku" and "lo ka gerku"? Is
there more than one "ka gerku", given a certain value for all those
"zo'e"s?

mu'o mi'e .adam