From pycyn@aol.com Mon Aug 27 08:38:40 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 15:38:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 52992 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 15:19:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 15:19:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m08.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.163)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 15:19:58 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.bb.12fc909f (17085)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:19:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <bb.12fc909f.28bbbf0d@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:19:41 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_bb.12fc909f.28bbbf0d_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_bb.12fc909f.28bbbf0d_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 8/26/2001 8:18:26 PM Central Daylight Time, 
phma@oltronics.net writes:


> This appears to mean "He came without my knowing," but it also claims that I 
> know. Comments?
> 

Well, we could say "Without my knowing what?" but I think we just have to 
recognize that some non-logical connectives have implicit {na} in them -- 
hardly a surprise, but not yet listed out.

--part1_bb.12fc909f.28bbbf0d_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/26/2001 8:18:26 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>phma@oltronics.net writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">This appears to mean "He came without my knowing," but it also claims that I 
<BR>know. Comments?
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Well, we could say "Without my knowing what?" &nbsp;but I think we just have to 
<BR>recognize that some non-logical connectives have implicit {na} in them -- 
<BR>hardly a surprise, but not yet listed out.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_bb.12fc909f.28bbbf0d_boundary--

