From cowan@ccil.org Mon Aug 27 10:49:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 17:49:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 27915 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 17:27:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 17:27:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 17:26:59 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15bQ9t-0004Tg-00; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:26:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: mine, etc. In-Reply-To: from And Rosta at "Aug 26, 2001 07:00:15 pm" To: a.rosta@ntlworld.com Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:26:45 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan And Rosta scripsit: > Out of interest, why is this? Is it because otherwise MOI wouldn't be > LALR1? yes. > What about if MOI preceded the Operand? Probably; I'd have to YACC it and see. -gua!spi, following Chinese, use a prefixed "moi". -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan