Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: mine, etc.

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:26:45 -0400 (EDT)

And Rosta scripsit:

> Out of interest, why is this? Is it because otherwise MOI wouldn't be
> LALR1?

yes.

> What about if MOI preceded the Operand?

Probably; I'd have to YACC it and see.

-gua!spi, following Chinese, use a prefixed "moi".

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email-masked]
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan