From xod@sixgirls.org Mon Aug 27 13:32:49 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 20:32:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 26792 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 20:21:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 20:21:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 20:21:28 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7RKLRg25130
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:21:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Ease of use considered harmful (was: lojban-tech list (was: Beginners'
  mailing list and scheduled IRC
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMMEBBEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108271618490.21447-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> I sent (or meant to send) my remarks as a private comment to Jorge, who
> in sending his reply must have thought my reply was one of the many
> quotidian victims of unmunged-headers-considered-harmful.



If you maintain a sane reply policy on jboske, in contrast to this most
annoying behavior noted above, I shall surely enjoy moving some traffic
there!




-----
"It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution
never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object
of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow
of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to
any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of
manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950



