From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 27 13:46:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 20:46:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 77628 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 20:36:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 20:36:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 20:36:44 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15bT7i-00087V-00 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:36:42 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:36:42 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Ease of use considered harmful (was: lojban-tech list (was: Beginners' mailing list and scheduled IRC Message-ID: <20010827133642.K26365@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i From: Robin Lee Powell On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:21:27PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote: > > > I sent (or meant to send) my remarks as a private comment to Jorge, who > > in sending his reply must have thought my reply was one of the many > > quotidian victims of unmunged-headers-considered-harmful. > > > > If you maintain a sane reply policy on jboske, in contrast to this most > annoying behavior noted above, I shall surely enjoy moving some traffic > there! I would like to mention, btw, that for lists like this I have reversed my position on Reply-To munging (I think it's probably a good thing). Although I still think it's a Very Bad Idea for some of the other lists I'm on. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/