From xod@sixgirls.org Mon Aug 27 14:02:37 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 21:02:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 55376 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 20:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 20:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 20:58:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7RKwLm25546 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:58:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:58:21 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: RE: [lojban] jboske list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote: > xod: > > If the beginners go away to beginnners, and the experts go to jboske, what > > is supposed to remain on this list? > > the experts would join jboske but not leave lojban list. Discussions that > bore the sh*t out 90% of lojban list subscribers and clog up their > inboxes could move to jboske, and in jboske people could when Real Life > is pressing set one or the other list nomail without losing touch > completely. Note the hypothetical woulds & coulds. At the very least it could become habit that arguments that erupt on the Wiki get moved to jboske and not the general list. ----- "It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950