From araizen@newmail.net Mon Aug 27 14:40:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 21:40:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 82903 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 21:38:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 21:38:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 21:38:40 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.181.138]) by out.newmail.net ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:39:33 +0200 Message-ID: <000201c12f49$2a71be60$8ab5003e@oemcomputer> To: References: <0108261702420R.01123@neofelis> Subject: Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 23:31:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 From: "Adam Raizen" la .pier. cusku di'e > This appears to mean "He came without my knowing," but it also claims that I know. Comments? I've come to the conclusion that "broda .i+stag+bo brode" doesn't necessarily imply both broda and brode (depending of the meaning of the tag). It's certainly not the case in "broda .inajenai brode". ".i" is supposed to be the unspecified logical connection between sentences, not a short version of ".ije". mu'o mi'e .adam