From araizen@newmail.net Mon Aug 27 17:03:57 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 28 Aug 2001 00:03:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 5546 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 00:03:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Aug 2001 00:03:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Aug 2001 00:03:13 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.182.36]) by out.newmail.net ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:04:03 +0200
Message-ID: <00f801c12f5d$598a89c0$8ab5003e@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMOEBBEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Subject: Re: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:00:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>

la .and. cusku di'e

> My own preferred but totally unofficial rule for zo'e
> is that it is a variable bound by an existential quantifier with
> maximally narrow scope, so zo'e are bound within the abstraction,
> and hence {ro ka broda cu pa mei}.

Do you mean with maximally broad scope (i.e. the prenex of the main
bridi, unless I don't understand narrow vs. broad scope)?

mu'o mi'e .adam.