Subject: Re: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:00:13 +0200

la .and. cusku di'e

> My own preferred but totally unofficial rule for zo'e
> is that it is a variable bound by an existential quantifier with
> maximally narrow scope, so zo'e are bound within the abstraction,
> and hence {ro ka broda cu pa mei}.

Do you mean with maximally broad scope (i.e. the prenex of the main
bridi, unless I don't understand narrow vs. broad scope)?

mu'o mi'e .adam.