From cowan@ccil.org Mon Aug 27 18:40:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 28 Aug 2001 01:40:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 64649 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 01:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Aug 2001 01:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta3 with SMTP; 28 Aug 2001 01:40:07 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15bXrT-0008Qx-00; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:40:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno In-Reply-To: <000201c12f49$2a71be60$8ab5003e@oemcomputer> from Adam Raizen at "Aug 27, 2001 11:31:03 pm" To: Adam Raizen Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:40:15 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Adam Raizen scripsit: > I've come to the conclusion that "broda .i+stag+bo brode" doesn't > necessarily imply both broda and brode (depending of the meaning of > the tag). It's certainly not the case in "broda .inajenai brode". ".i" > is supposed to be the unspecified logical connection between > sentences, not a short version of ".ije". Actually, .i is a long scope version of .ije, not unspecified connection. And i+stag+bo does assert both sentences unless there is a negation involved. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan