Subject: Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:40:15 -0400 (EDT)

Adam Raizen scripsit:

> I've come to the conclusion that "broda .i+stag+bo brode" doesn't
> necessarily imply both broda and brode (depending of the meaning of
> the tag). It's certainly not the case in "broda .inajenai brode". ".i"
> is supposed to be the unspecified logical connection between
> sentences, not a short version of ".ije".

Actually, .i is a long scope version of .ije, not unspecified
connection. And i+stag+bo does assert both sentences unless
there is a negation involved.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email-masked]
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan