From rob@twcny.rr.com Wed Aug 29 12:16:00 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@telenet.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 19:15:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 72676 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 19:14:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 19:14:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO telenet.net) (204.97.152.225) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 19:14:14 -0000 Received: from riff (ip-209-23-14-44.modem.logical.net [209.23.14.44]) by telenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA29203 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:14:12 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15cAmc-0000Cm-00 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:13:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:13:49 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u Message-ID: <20010829151349.A740@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com Sender: Rob Speer From: Rob Speer I'm starting to see what you mean by problems with word order in bare ka, by the proposal that I think was xorxes' and that I think is the one you put on the Wiki. So now my thoughts have come full-circle to this: 1. A ka with ce'u in it means what it says. (I believe everyone but pc would agree to this.) 2. A ka without ce'u in it means something, and good luck figuring it out. -- Rob Speer