Subject: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u

From: Rob Speer <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:21:36 -0400

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 02:09:27PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> unfortunately that doesn't tell us much. If people understood when they
> need ce'u and if they never elided it, then you would have seen it. And
> in discussions of, say, definitional issues (e.g. "Is daterape rape?")
> you'd get a lot of all-ce'us.

I think the way to say that would be to say 
{xu du la'ezo -daterape la'ezo -rape}
and avoid ce'u altogether. Just because we've been talking about ce'u a lot
doesn't mean you have to use it.

In other words, I think la'ezo already does what the ka/du'u/si'o proposal says
lesi'o should do.
--
Rob Speer