From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Wed Aug 29 13:46:24 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 20:46:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 29214 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 20:34:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 20:34:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 20:34:17 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.90.250]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
  id <20010829203415.CAIE23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:34:15 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:33:29 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEDOEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0108281933150.22541-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

Nick:
> (3) ke'a does not resolve what to do when there are embedded places in
> *its* abstraction;
> coincidentally, I was thinking of this just this morning, walking to work.
> (More evidence I've been doing too much Lojban.) Since the verdict is that
> they behave similarly, let's not fix ce'u in those contexts before we have
> a clear tendency on ke'a.

Can you tell me what the issues about ke'a are that you think need to be
resolved? Are you thinking of NOI within NOI?

--And.