From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Wed Aug 29 13:47:36 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 20:47:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 30288 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 20:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 20:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43) by mta2 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 20:34:28 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.90.250]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010829203427.CAML23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:34:27 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] pe BAI on tense markers Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:33:41 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" Xod: [...] > > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > > > > > > a. ko'e zbasu le dinju lo staku be seba'i lo rokci > > > > (The brick was made of something else instead of stone, maybe.) > > > > b. ko'e zbasu le dinju lo staku pe seba'i lo rokci > > > > (The tower was made of brick instead of of stone. > > I don't see any difference! > > le dinju be fi'e mi > The building with creator = me > > le dinju pe fi'e mi > The building that has creator = me > > Is this wrong? Somebody said pe works like be in this case. I think they > quoted the book but I am too lazy to check. le se dinju pe fi'e mi = the building-purpose that has creator = me le se dinju be fi'e mi = that whose relationship with the building it is the purpose of involves creator me le se dinju be zo'e pe fi'e mi = the purpose of the building whose creator is me Or? --And.