Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Another stab at a Record on ce'u

From: Nick NICHOLAS <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT)

cu'u la .and.

>Can you tell me what the issues about ke'a are that you think need to be
>resolved? Are you thinking of NOI within NOI?

NU within NOI, actually:

.i mi kelci lo selkei poi mi djica lenu __ kelci __ kei __

.i ko skicu le te mukti poi do djica lenu __ kelci __ kei __

Left to just semantics, these occupy different slots for their respective
ke'a.

And in yet another backflip, I think they *should*; I think the convention
is suspended at this level of complexity, and you're on your own
recognisance with ke'a.

-- 
== == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
Nick Nicholas, Breathing {le'o ko na rivbi fi'inai palci je tolvri danlu}
[email-masked] -- Miguel Cervantes tr. Jorge LLambias