From nicholas@uci.edu Wed Aug 29 14:06:34 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: nicholas@uci.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 21:06:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 86936 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 20:54:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 20:54:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e4e.oac.uci.edu) (128.200.222.10) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 20:54:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (nicholas@localhost) by e4e.oac.uci.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20504; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: e4e.oac.uci.edu: nicholas owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: To: Cc: Nick NICHOLAS Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Another stab at a Record on ce'u Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Nick NICHOLAS cu'u la .and. >Can you tell me what the issues about ke'a are that you think need to be >resolved? Are you thinking of NOI within NOI? NU within NOI, actually: .i mi kelci lo selkei poi mi djica lenu __ kelci __ kei __ .i ko skicu le te mukti poi do djica lenu __ kelci __ kei __ Left to just semantics, these occupy different slots for their respective ke'a. And in yet another backflip, I think they *should*; I think the convention is suspended at this level of complexity, and you're on your own recognisance with ke'a. -- == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == Nick Nicholas, Breathing {le'o ko na rivbi fi'inai palci je tolvri danlu} nicholas@uci.edu -- Miguel Cervantes tr. Jorge LLambias