From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Wed Aug 29 15:02:33 2001
Return-Path: <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 22:02:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 24099 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 21:52:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 21:52:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scrabble.freeuk.net) (212.126.144.6)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 21:52:04 -0000
Received: from du-008-0092.freeuk.com ([212.126.151.92] helo=rrbcurnow.freeuk.com)
  by scrabble.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2)
  id 15cDFh-0002rj-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:52:02 +0100
Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2)
  id 15cCXG-0003bY-00; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:06:06 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:06:06 +0100
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] jboske list
Message-ID: <20010829220606.B9524@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <v0300780fb7ae17d7bbb3@[128.195.186.34]> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108261622290.14385-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108261622290.14385-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>; from xod@sixgirls.org on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:23:18PM -0400
From: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>

On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:23:18PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote:
> 
> If the beginners go away to beginnners, and the experts go to jboske, what
> is supposed to remain on this list?
> 

Well, one useful thing would be the final decision on each issue that is
discussed on jboske. So it would be rather like the postings whose
subject starts "Record:". Or is this information going to be collated
on the WWW somewhere, as part of the ongoing effort to document the
issues that the Book doesn't fully resolve? (For that matter, is there
such a site somewhere yet?)

Personally, I'd like to follow 'definitive rulings' on language usage,
but I just haven't got the time to read the threads in enough detail to
do them justice. Unfortunately, I fear this probably means I miss the
key posting that contains the final answer to some issues :-(

-- 
R.P.Curnow,Weston-super-Mare,UK | C++: n., An octopus made by
http://www.rrbcurnow.freeuk.com/ | nailing extra legs on a cat.

