From pycyn@aol.com Wed Aug 29 16:32:58 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 29 Aug 2001 23:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 51936 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 23:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Aug 2001 23:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r03.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.99) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 23:32:57 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.45.b8a83c8 (3893) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:32:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <45.b8a83c8.28bed599@aol.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:32:41 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] The Knights who forgot to say "ni!" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_45.b8a83c8.28bed599_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_45.b8a83c8.28bed599_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/29/2001 2:33:53 PM Central Daylight Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes: > Of course, I think that interpretation is a load of {malfesti}. > And what would be the xamfesti on this issue? --part1_45.b8a83c8.28bed599_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/29/2001 2:33:53 PM Central Daylight Time,
rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


Of course, I think that interpretation is a load of {malfesti}.

And what would be the xamfesti on this issue? --part1_45.b8a83c8.28bed599_boundary--