From rob@twcny.rr.com Wed Aug 29 20:09:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@telenet.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 30 Aug 2001 03:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 36653 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 03:09:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Aug 2001 03:09:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO telenet.net) (204.97.152.225) by mta3 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 03:09:04 -0000 Received: from riff (ip-209-23-14-44.modem.logical.net [209.23.14.44]) by telenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA31020 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:09:02 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15cIC9-0000YA-00 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:08:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:08:40 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u Message-ID: <20010829230840.B1483@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <34.1a196842.28bed596@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34.1a196842.28bed596@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com Sender: Rob Speer From: Rob Speer On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:32:38PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 8/29/2001 2:18:26 PM Central Daylight Time, > rob@twcny.rr.com writes: > > > 1. A ka with ce'u in it means what it says. (I believe everyone but pc would > > agree to this.) > > > > Actually, if you check, you'll see I am back to this as well, although it may > mean more, depending on where the {ce'u} is (I'm still trying to fulfill the > reduction clause in the project). A {ka} with all its {ce'u} and {zo'e} in > means what it says as does one with a {ce'u} in the first non-content place > and wherever else wanted. That's not quite what I said. I think we have to agree that any ka with an explicit ce'u has no other ce'u in it, even if some of its places are elided. Nothing should depend on where the ce'u is. -- Rob Speer