From araizen@newmail.net Fri Aug 31 08:08:07 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 31 Aug 2001 15:08:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 53290 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 15:05:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2001 15:05:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 15:05:12 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.180.216]) by out.newmail.net ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:06:12 +0200
Message-ID: <032c01c13236$dfaa7e80$8ab5003e@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <v03007804b7afa51c1779@[128.195.187.106]>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Induction
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:03:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>

la .nitcion. cusku di'e

> induction is sucta. deduction and abduction are both tolsucta.
deduction is
> the logical reverse of abduction.

We still don't have a way to say "conclude", whether by induction,
deduction, or abduction (i.e. the bridi equivalent of "ja'o"). Unless
perhaps this is "jinvi".

mu'o mi'e .adam.