From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Aug 31 10:29:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 31 Aug 2001 17:29:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10721 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 17:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2001 17:27:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 17:27:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7VHRsN27712 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: RE: [lojban] li'i (was: Another stab at a Record on ce'u In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote: > pc: > > As near as I can make out from what And says in recognizable Lojban > > or English, the use of the second argument is application of the argument to > > the (first?) lambda variable in the the phrase, i.e., > mi> = (different "quotes" since the stuff inside is not > > obviously Lojban). > > I have not said anything even remotely like this, unless by some calamitous > typing error while tired. > > {le si'o ce'u broda kei be mi} = my notion of Broda Why are you putting a ce'u in si'o? Aren't all the places filled with ce'u? ----- "We should destroy the Muslims' homes while leaving the Christians' homes alone." -- Rehavam Zeevi, Israeli Tourism Minister