From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Aug 31 15:56:39 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 31 Aug 2001 22:56:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 83111 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 22:56:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2001 22:56:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.77)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 22:56:38 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:56:35 -0700
Received: from 200.41.247.53 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:56:34 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.53]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] properties vs. relationships
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:56:34 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F77HfqR77bieLYCT4aJ000031db@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2001 22:56:35.0151 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F211DF0:01C13270]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la adam cusku di'e

>Why is it that there is a property in the x3 of
>
> do cnino mi le ka ce'u xunre

{ko'a ckaji ko'i} is part of what {ko'a cnino ko'e ko'i} is about.

>Couldn't it just as easily be
>
> do cnino mi le ka le nu ce'u xunre cu se sanji ce'u

I suppose it could be defined like that, but then x3 of cnino,
instead of being more or less any one-ce'u property, would be
restricted to be a very special subset of 2-ce'u relationships,
those where the second argument is an evaluator or something
like that. What do we gain by complicating so much this place?

>Likewise with "ko'a pamoi lei nanmu le ka ce'u clani". Shouldn't it be
>
> ko'a pamoi lei nanmu le ka ce'u clamau ce'u

Again it is possible, but it gives to moi a far more complicated
meaning.

>Otherwise, how would you get ascending order vs. descending order?

{pamoi fi le ka clani} vs. {pamoi fi la ka tordu}.

>Maybe the short forms should be considered abbreviations of the ones
>with an explicit relationship.

I think the meaning of the selbri would be different in each case.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


