From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Sep 01 06:39:06 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 1 Sep 2001 13:39:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 54277 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2001 13:39:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 Sep 2001 13:39:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2001 13:39:05 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.41.102]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
  id <20010901133904.FAZO20588.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:39:04 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: mo'e (was: RE: [lojban] useless selmaho? 
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:38:15 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEGEEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <032f01c13236$e46176e0$8ab5003e@oemcomputer>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

Adam:
> Isn't "mo'e" supposed to be used in cases like
> 
> li mo'e re dirgo su'i mo'e re dirgo na du li mo'e vo dirgo
> 
> Though perhaps "loi vo lo dirgo na sumji loi re lo dirgo loi re lo
> dirgo" is better. (Book p. 456, ch. 18.18.3) Thus "mo'e lo spaji"
> would be a surprise, but can be used grammatically as a number. "A
> surprising number" would be "[mo'e] lo namcu poi [jai] spaji".

Or just "[mo'e] lo [jai] spaji".

--And.