From phma@oltronics.net Sat Sep 01 20:40:25 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 2 Sep 2001 03:40:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 72536 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2001 03:40:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Sep 2001 03:40:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.239)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2001 03:40:23 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id 9F3883C4BF; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 23:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: clashes
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 23:38:46 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0109012338460P.01089@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

I see comments in various pages in the Wiki that some proposed gismu clashes 
with some preexisting gismu. For instance, {tango} is said to clash with 
{tanko}. I know that similar consonants were checked when making the gimste, 
but I don't see why anything but having the same first four letters is a 
clash, according to the morphology.

phma