From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sun Sep 02 08:10:52 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 2 Sep 2001 15:10:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 63589 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2001 15:10:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Sep 2001 15:10:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2001 15:10:32 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.88.86]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
  id <20010902151030.VJAB20588.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 16:10:30 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] li'i (was: Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 16:09:45 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEHBEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108311324470.27400-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

Xod:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, And Rosta wrote:
>
> > pc:
> > > As near as I can make out from what And says in recognizable Lojban
> > > or English, the use of the second argument is application of the
> argument to
> > > the (first?) lambda variable in the the phrase, i.e., <le si'o
> ce'u broda be
> > > mi> = <le du'u mi broda> (different "quotes" since the stuff inside is not
> > > obviously Lojban).
> >
> > I have not said anything even remotely like this, unless by some calamitous
> > typing error while tired.
> >
> > {le si'o ce'u broda kei be mi} = my notion of Broda
>
> Why are you putting a ce'u in si'o? Aren't all the places filled with
> ce'u?

Yes they are, but pc was saying stuff about <le si'o ce'u broda be mi>,
so I explained what it meant. It is equivalent to <le si'o broda be mi>.

--And.