Subject: Re: [lojban] the set of answers

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:05:31 +0200

[xorxes' set interpretation of 'makau]

How would you then interpret a 'makau' at the main bridi level? It
claims all the members of the set are true? Or at least one of them?

> >Or, we could reinterpret what the x3 of frica should be and make it
> >into a relationship: "la .dabias. frica la .tcelsis. le ka ce'u se
> >mamta lo na du be le mamta be ce'u".
>
> I don't like that, it makes it much more complicated to use.

Just experimenting.

mu'o mi'e .adam.