From pycyn@aol.com Mon Sep 03 16:48:26 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 3 Sep 2001 23:48:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 57923 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2001 23:47:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Sep 2001 23:47:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m03.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.6)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 23:47:57 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.164.480eaa (4404)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 19:47:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <164.480eaa.28c570a4@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 19:47:48 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] the set of answers
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_164.480eaa.28c570a4_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_164.480eaa.28c570a4_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/3/2001 4:49:52 PM Central Daylight Time, 
araizen@newmail.net writes:


> How would you then interpret a 'makau' at the main bridi level? It
> 

At least one of them

<> >Or, we could reinterpret what the x3 of frica should be and make it
> >into a relationship: "la .dabias. frica la .tcelsis. le ka ce'u se
> >mamta lo na du be le mamta be ce'u".
>
> I don't like that, it makes it much more complicated to use.

Just experimenting.>

Don' t need it {lo ka makau mamte ce'u} is enough.

--part1_164.480eaa.28c570a4_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 9/3/2001 4:49:52 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>araizen@newmail.net writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">How would you then interpret a 'makau' at the main bridi level? It
<BR>claims all the members of the set are true? Or at least one of them?</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>At least one of them
<BR>
<BR>&lt;&gt; &gt;Or, we could reinterpret what the x3 of frica should be and make it
<BR>&gt; &gt;into a relationship: "la .dabias. frica la .tcelsis. le ka ce'u se
<BR>&gt; &gt;mamta lo na du be le mamta be ce'u".
<BR>&gt;
<BR>&gt; I don't like that, it makes it much more complicated to use.
<BR>
<BR>Just experimenting.&gt;
<BR>
<BR>Don' t need it {lo ka makau mamte ce'u} is enough.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_164.480eaa.28c570a4_boundary--

