From pycyn@aol.com Mon Sep 03 17:08:11 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 4 Sep 2001 00:08:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 18748 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 00:08:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Sep 2001 00:08:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r04.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.100) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 00:08:03 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.149.fb3bf0 (4404) for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:07:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <149.fb3bf0.28c5755b@aol.com> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:07:55 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] A serious but ungeneralized new attempt on Q-kau To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_149.fb3bf0.28c5755b_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_149.fb3bf0.28c5755b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Not a good day for vocab work but "What I have for dinner depneds on what is in the fridge' seems to be a properly lexed version of {lenu makau I have for dinner cu some-lujvo-of-{tcini} lo nu makau is in the fridge} where the selbri requires that each member of the first set have some member(s) of the second set among its necessary, sufficient or high-probability conditions. ({tcini} may be wrong but it is about the only gismu which joins two situations without putting a heavy burden on them.) At least the sumti are about right, when lexed. --part1_149.fb3bf0.28c5755b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Not a good day for vocab work but
"What I have for dinner depneds on what is in the fridge' seems to be a
properly lexed version of
{lenu makau I have for dinner cu some-lujvo-of-{tcini} lo nu makau is in the
fridge}

where the selbri requires that each member of the first set have some
member(s) of the second set among its necessary, sufficient or
high-probability conditions. ({tcini} may be wrong but it is about the only
gismu which joins two situations without putting a heavy burden on them.) At
least the sumti are about right, when lexed. --part1_149.fb3bf0.28c5755b_boundary--