From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Sep 04 09:57:04 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 4 Sep 2001 16:57:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 67600 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 16:37:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Sep 2001 16:37:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 16:37:31 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:15:37 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:44:02 +0100
Message-Id: <sb9512e2.063@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:43:34 +0100
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] A serious but ungeneralized new attempt on Q-kau
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>

That's my feeling too. We need to be formalizing a makauless
"set-of-answers" or equivalent.

I'm thinking of something like=20

da zo'u=20
... lo du'u da du the-extension-of lo du'u ce'u klama kei kei poi jetnu

da zo'u=20
... lo du'u da du the-extension-of lo du'u ce'u prami ce'u kei kei poi je=
tnu

But I haven't thought through how this works for the dinner/friedge case.

I realize people (pc) replied to that original proposal & I haven't answere=
d those replies yet. But the new academic year is beginning.

--And.

>>> Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com> 09/04/01 03:56pm >>>


la and cusku di'e

>And how do we get rid of the makau? Thus? --
>
> For every x, for every y that is a ka'e nu I have x for dinner: there=
=20
>is some
> z such that y's occurrence conditions include z's being in the fridge.

Unless x and z can take the value "noda", and I think you don't
intend it that way, that doesn't work.

The set of answers, {lo'i nu mi ba citka makau}, is not
logically related to the set of things I will/may have for
dinner {lo'i ba se citka be mi}. At least there is no
straightforward relationship. Trying to reduce makau in
terms of the latter set, I don't think it will work.

mu'o mi'e xorxes





_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp=
=20



To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20




