From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Sep 04 18:28:55 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 5 Sep 2001 01:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 57358 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 01:28:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Sep 2001 01:28:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.151) by mta2 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 01:28:55 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:28:55 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.54 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 01:28:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.54] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: Fwd: [lojban] the set of answers Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 01:28:54 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2001 01:28:55.0169 (UTC) FILETIME=[20A82F10:01C135AA] From: "Jorge Llambias" la pycyn cusku di'e >On the issue of the relation between interrogative and relative phrases, it >is worth noting that, except for {du'u} with cognitive predicates that >demand >a proposition, each of these indirect questions has an essentially >equivalent >direct form >{la bab dunli la bil lo ni ce'u clano}, {la dubias frica la tclsys lo mamte >be ce'u} That would require {la dubias frica la tclsys la babras}. It doesn't sound right to me. The same goes for the others: {la bab dunli la bil li xapi'emu}? (I'm taking {ni} here as {jai sela'u}, as you are, not as {ka sela'u makau} as commonly used.) mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp