From thedward@barsoom.net Wed Sep 05 00:00:01 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: thedward@barsoom.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 5 Sep 2001 07:00:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1251 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 07:00:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Sep 2001 07:00:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kamkalsa.dyn.cheapnet.net) (66.68.62.112) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 07:00:00 -0000 Received: by kamkalsa.dyn.cheapnet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E7DD31C083; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:59:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:53:18 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Questions and observations about taxonomy Message-ID: <20010905015318.A31214@barsoom.net> References: <0109050059520X.05217@neofelis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Resent-From: thedward@barsoom.net Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:59:59 -0500 Resent-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Resent-Message-Id: <20010905065959.E7DD31C083@kamkalsa.dyn.cheapnet.net> From: the Edward Blevins On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Jay Kominek wrote: > > What exactly does {smani} mean? (asked by me a long time ago, with no answer, > > and again by nitcion) > > primate significantly below humans on the evolutionary ladder? According to the gismu list, it includes chimpanzees and if that is the case it should certainly include humans. Humans are closer to chimpanzees than either is to the other primates. -- the Edward Blevins (512) 436-9576 /(0\ mi tavla fo la lojban .i xu do go'i? \1)/ .i.e'u ko vitke fi zoi .url. http://www.lojban.org .url. Today is Pungenday, the 29th day of Bureaucracy, 3167.