From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Sep 05 10:56:06 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 5 Sep 2001 17:56:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 86061 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 17:34:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Sep 2001 17:34:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 17:34:16 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15egZ3-0000sz-00 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:34:13 -0700 Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:34:13 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u Message-ID: <20010905103413.A9009@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i From: Robin Lee Powell On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:07:56PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > And Rosta scripsit: > > > or, in an intriguing novel (but probably bad) usage I haven't > > considered before: > > > > xu ro ka ce'u -daterape ce'u ka ce'u -rape ce'u > > xu ro si'o -daterape kei si'o -rape > > I think that no concept of date rape is a concept of rape -- they are > distinct concepts. Rather, every *event* of date rape is an event of > rape: ro nu -daterape kei nu -rape. And who says that lojban has no real-world usage? 80 -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/