From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Thu Sep 06 17:56:51 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 00:56:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 1353 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 00:49:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 00:49:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta07-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.47)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 00:49:39 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.88.88]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
  id <20010907004937.NZAM710.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:49:37 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:48:54 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEKBEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <E15eg9c-00068n-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > or, in an intriguing novel (but probably bad) usage I haven't 
> > considered before:
> > 
> > xu ro ka ce'u -daterape ce'u ka ce'u -rape ce'u
> > xu ro si'o -daterape kei si'o -rape 
> 
> I think that no concept of date rape is a concept of rape -- they
> are distinct concepts. Rather, every *event* of date rape is an
> event of rape: ro nu -daterape kei nu -rape.

Certainly life will be simpler if we agree with you (because what
you say is sane, I mean).

--And.