From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Sep 06 20:01:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 03:01:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 71367 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 03:00:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 03:00:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta2 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 03:00:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f87303a17637 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:00:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:00:03 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: RE: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, And Rosta wrote: > I think that Jorge's conception of {lo'e} has always been incompatible > with {lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko}. But {lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko} > is objectionable, because it is prone to ambiguity. For example, we > can discuss the prototypical or archetypal lion, without it then > being the case that non-atypical lions have been discussed by us. > Gadri + sumti tail is simply not the right way to do archetypes; it > clearly calls for some sort of bridi abstraction, such that xabju > le friko would be within the abstraction, while "discussed by us" > would be outside. Please follow up this suggestion with the appropriate gismu to stick in su'u2 to achieve the desired result! ----- "We should destroy the Muslims' homes while leaving the Christians' homes alone." -- Rehavam Zeevi, Israeli Tourism Minister