From pycyn@aol.com Fri Sep 07 01:32:57 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 08:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13862 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 08:32:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 08:32:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r08.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.104) by mta3 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 08:32:56 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.151.934359 (4012) for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 04:32:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <151.934359.28c9e032@aol.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 04:32:50 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] A serious but ungeneralized new attempt on Q-kau To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_151.934359.28c9e032_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_151.934359.28c9e032_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/6/2001 7:58:08 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes: > No, for two reasons. First of all, you need "poi ge jetnu gi du'u > da prami de" to be a restriction on da and on de, but it isn't. As > it stands, you're claiming that ko'a knows that everything loves > everything. IIRC, though, there is a way to get one relative clause to > modify two conjoined sumti, but I can't remember offhand how to do it. > Not "every one loves everyone" even, the quantifiers are outside the the {du'u} -- unless of course, everyone DOES love everyone, in which case all those props are true. --part1_151.934359.28c9e032_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/6/2001 7:58:08 PM Central Daylight Time,
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:


No, for two reasons. First of all, you need "poi ge jetnu gi du'u
da prami de" to be a restriction on da and on de, but it isn't. As
it stands, you're claiming that ko'a knows that everything loves
everything. IIRC, though, there is a way to get one relative clause to
modify two conjoined sumti, but I can't remember offhand how to do it.

Not "every one loves everyone" even, the quantifiers are outside the the
{du'u}
-- unless of course, everyone DOES love everyone, in which case all those
props are true.
--part1_151.934359.28c9e032_boundary--