From cowan@ccil.org Fri Sep 07 03:26:07 2001
Return-Path: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 10:26:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 25982 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 10:26:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 10:26:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 10:26:06 -0000
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
  id 15fIpE-0000iv-00; Fri, 07 Sep 2001 06:25:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
In-Reply-To: <115.453ffe2.28c9e031@aol.com> from "pycyn@aol.com" at "Sep 7, 2001
  04:32:49 am"
To: pycyn@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:25:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15fIpE-0000iv-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>

pycyn@aol.com scripsit:

> But odd: is the connection between the two event cartegories necessary? 
> could there be a date-rape that is not a rape? If not, then there has to be 
> a conceptual connection as well: they may be distinct concepts and yet one be 
> a sub concept of the other.

Certainly. But that is expressed with an ordinary selbri meaning "x1 is
a subconcept of x2".

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan

