From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Fri Sep 07 05:51:46 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 12:51:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 55599 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 12:51:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 12:51:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta01-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.41)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 12:51:46 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.40.173]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
  id <20010907125144.NPUR15984.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:51:44 +0100
To: "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: sumti antecedents
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:51:00 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGELLEKAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>

According to

http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?construal%20of%20antecedents%20of%20sumti%2
0anaphors

the sumti antecedent of an anaphor repeats any quantification within
the sumti. Although this was written by me, I'm sure I wrote it up
because there had been some agreement on it. I don't object if the
agreement is rescinded; I just want to point out that I am not
imagining that it fleetingly existed.

--And.