From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Sep 08 11:07:02 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 8 Sep 2001 18:07:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 61826 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 18:07:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Sep 2001 18:07:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2001 18:07:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f88I6x702758 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 14:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 14:06:59 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] ko'a klama .isecaubo mi djuno In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > la xod cusku di'e > > >What about {mi claxu le fipybirka} > >I lack all of the subset of actual fish fins I have in mind > >(where I happen to have all of them in mind) > > That's the same as {mi claxu ro fipybirka} then. Why do you think this is clumsy? I think it's a great example of how to express oneself in a Logical Language. And does {mi claxu lo'e fipybirka} leave open that {mi tolclaxu na'ebo lo'e fipybirka}? ----- "We should destroy the Muslims' homes while leaving the Christians' homes alone." -- Rehavam Zeevi, Israeli Tourism Minister