From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Sep 08 14:44:10 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 8 Sep 2001 21:44:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 47259 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 21:44:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Sep 2001 21:44:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43) by mta2 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2001 21:44:09 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.255.42.63]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010908214404.GBCS23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:44:04 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: archetype abstraction (was: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:43:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" XOD: > > I don't know how su'u x1 and x2 are supposed to work, and nor do I know > > how to implement what I argued for above. However, very tentatively, > > and intuitively, I could start the ball rolling with this: > > > > tu'o si'o cinfo kei se su'u ce'u xabju le friko > > > > as a way of saying that the archetypal lion archetypally-has the > > property of living in Africa. As for "We discussed the archetypal lion", > > I don't know. Maybe > > > > mi'a simxu tu'o du'u ce'u ce'u tavla loi su'u be tu'o si'o cinfo > > > > All this is just a first stab, and there to be improved on. > > My 1st stab at an archetype abstractor is > > su'u broda kei be le sucta/prane > > prane because, although the keyword is "perfect": > > x1 is perfect/ideal/archetypical/faultless/flawless/un-improvable in > property/aspect x2 (ka) Any ideas how to do "X lives in Africa" versus "We argued about X"? --And.