From pycyn@aol.com Sat Sep 08 16:51:35 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 8 Sep 2001 23:51:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 59158 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 23:51:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Sep 2001 23:51:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r07.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.103) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2001 23:51:31 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.de.1a24ed88 (3980) for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 19:51:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 19:51:28 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Mark on wiki on lerfu To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_de.1a24ed88.28cc0900_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_de.1a24ed88.28cc0900_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/8/2001 5:45:03 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: > Actually, there's lots more: last, lasp, lask, lact, latc, laks, > lank, lart, and so on are all single-syllable too. > Gringe. Can someone remind me of the point of this, please. Why would we want all these horrors, assigned or not? The maximum effective anaphora is going to contain maybe half-a-dozen connections tops; beyond that we cannot either remember or calculate the reference, whence the slogan "Repetition is also anaphora." It is nice to ahve all these tools available for choices, but we do not need them to do the work (we don't even need the fo'V set, rpobably, as witness there heavy use so far.) --part1_de.1a24ed88.28cc0900_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/8/2001 5:45:03 PM Central Daylight Time,
jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:


Actually, there's lots more: last, lasp, lask, lact, latc, laks,
lank, lart, and so on are all single-syllable too.


Gringe.  Can someone remind me of the point of this, please.  Why would we
want all these horrors, assigned or not?  The maximum effective anaphora is
going to contain maybe half-a-dozen connections tops; beyond that we cannot
either remember or calculate the reference, whence the slogan "Repetition is
also anaphora."  It is nice to ahve all these tools available for choices,
but we do not need them to do the work (we don't even need the fo'V set,
rpobably, as witness there heavy use so far.) --part1_de.1a24ed88.28cc0900_boundary--