From phma@oltronics.net Sun Sep 09 18:41:22 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 10 Sep 2001 01:41:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 54570 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 01:41:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2001 01:41:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.228)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 01:40:08 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id A59433C54E; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:09:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Antelopes
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:09:40 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFKELICDAA.raganok@intrex.net>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFKELICDAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01090921094031.05217@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

On Sunday 09 September 2001 19:49, Craig wrote:
> Base it on bovni. I think you already know my views on fu'ivla, but for
> those that don't, I feel they should only be used when necessary, such as
> for taxonomy, and that the lower the type the better. Please don't use
> .antilope, use bovnrntelopi or whatever for the specific subfamilies - I
> dislike type 4s AND think that, as you point out, .antilope is rather
> malglico.

There is no such word as {bovni}.

phma