From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Mon Sep 10 14:18:31 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 10 Sep 2001 21:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 82177 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 20:56:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2001 20:56:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n3.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.10.42) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 20:56:20 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.2.55] by hj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2001 20:55:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:55:53 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Conlang Ethnologue entries Message-ID: <9nj9cp+bvc8@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 811 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 62.104.218.85 From: "A.W.T." --- In lojban@y..., "michael helsem" wrote: > >From: "A.W.T." > li'o > >BTW, why all this childish fancy stuff of Lojbanistan, national >anthem, > >banner, dialects > >etc.? This all is really pretty nice and Tolkien-like - I do have a certain > >sense for playfulness too :-) - but do we (i.e. the * > >seriously meant* language Lojban!) really need such disneyworld klimbim? > > oh i think it is good thing that there is a Wiki for this that's > not Lojban Central but retains the odd ideas that arise more or > less independently; this "klimbim" is not logical but it is exactly > what cultures do... how else are we going to find out what Lojban > does to our heads, unless we play around in it? Exactly, the Wiki is the place for this "experimental klimbim". .aulun.