From pycyn@aol.com Mon Sep 10 14:35:27 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 10 Sep 2001 21:35:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 49931 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 21:17:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2001 21:17:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d06.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.38)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 21:17:23 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.14.1a5b55c9 (4359)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:17:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <14.1a5b55c9.28ce87df@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:17:19 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Conlang Ethnologue entries
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_14.1a5b55c9.28ce87df_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_14.1a5b55c9.28ce87df_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/10/2001 2:09:23 PM Central Daylight Time, 
xod@sixgirls.org writes:


> This was my fear with all this work on a Tengwar Lojban mode. I spent many
> months working with Tengwar back in high school and appreciate its beauty.
> But I am afraid to associate Lojban, whose seriousness is at question
> merely because it is a conlang, with the frivolous, nerdy reputation of
> sci fi conventions, sword and sorcery, and Dungeons and Dragons. Lojban is
> more serious than people think, and it needs to do everything possible to
> appear that way. There is a lot of weird, goofy, and useless junk on the
> net.
> 

Amen and Hallelujah! Though I doubt it does all that much harm (we don't 
have enough recognition to be seriously harmed), but it does foster an 
attitude -- and possibly collect a few attituded.

--part1_14.1a5b55c9.28ce87df_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 9/10/2001 2:09:23 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>xod@sixgirls.org writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">This was my fear with all this work on a Tengwar Lojban mode. I spent many
<BR>months working with Tengwar back in high school and appreciate its beauty.
<BR>But I am afraid to associate Lojban, whose seriousness is at question
<BR>merely because it is a conlang, with the frivolous, nerdy reputation of
<BR>sci fi conventions, sword and sorcery, and Dungeons and Dragons. Lojban is
<BR>more serious than people think, and it needs to do everything possible to
<BR>appear that way. There is a lot of weird, goofy, and useless junk on the
<BR>net.
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Amen and Hallelujah! &nbsp;Though I doubt it does all that much harm (we don't 
<BR>have enough recognition to be seriously harmed), but it does foster an 
<BR>attitude -- and possibly collect a few attituded.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_14.1a5b55c9.28ce87df_boundary--

