From nicholas@uci.edu Wed Sep 12 20:55:12 2001
Return-Path: <nicholas@uci.edu>
X-Sender: nicholas@uci.edu
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 13 Sep 2001 03:55:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 59344 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2001 03:55:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2001 03:55:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO e4e.oac.uci.edu) (128.200.222.10)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 03:55:01 -0000
Received: from localhost (nicholas@localhost)
  by e4e.oac.uci.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA10683;
  Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: e4e.oac.uci.edu: nicholas owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: <nicholas@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>
Subject: Re: Better "hardliner" definition
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109122045170.6258-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>


cu'u la xod.

>Perhaps the "hardliner"/"naturalist" division, one that I never quite
>understood, is better approximated as the tension between those that focus
>on the "Logical Language" aspect, vs. the "Sapir-Whorf" aspect.

Absolutely. (Or at least, it best characterises the tension between *us*.
:-) )

-- 
== == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
Nick Nicholas, Breathing I REJECT {gumri}
nicholas@uci.edu (Lojban Wiki, Resurrected Gismu)


