From rob@twcny.rr.com Wed Sep 12 21:44:39 2001
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 13 Sep 2001 04:44:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 87888 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2001 04:43:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2001 04:43:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.169)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 04:43:28 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74])
  by mailout5.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f8D4gQo01118
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:42:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
  ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:42:23 -0400
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
  id 15hOL2-0000aO-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:42:56 -0400
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:42:55 -0400
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: (from lojban-beginners) pi'e
Message-ID: <20010913004255.C1780@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109122115180.6258-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0109122115180.6258-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>

On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:18:45PM -0700, Nick NICHOLAS wrote:
> 
> cu'u la rab.
> 
> >To express a time and a date simultaneously, I would say this:
> >{mi jbena fi li 8:24 pe li 13:9:1973}
> 
> Though there's no intrinsic reason you can't combine time and date into
> the one leviathan:
> 
> mi jbena fi li 8 pi'e 24 pi'e 13 pi'e 9 pi'e 1973 (24 hour time, I hope,
> right? :-)

(We've answered the question, so I think I'll bring this over to the main
list...)

I think there is an intrinsic reason. Dates go from smaller to larger units,
and times go from larger to smaller. Combining them like that gives the bizarre
order: hour, minute, [second], day, month, year.

Does that work? It seems to me that pi'e should bear at least some resemblance
to an ordinary decimal point.
-- 
Rob Speer


