From pycyn@aol.com Thu Sep 13 05:25:38 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 13 Sep 2001 12:25:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 92957 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2001 12:25:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2001 12:25:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m04.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.7) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 12:25:37 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.5b.1ba1538b (2614) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:23:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5b.1ba1538b.28d1ff34@aol.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:23:16 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o (fwd) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_5b.1ba1538b.28d1ff34_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_5b.1ba1538b.28d1ff34_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/12/2001 11:19:54 PM Central Daylight Time, rob@twcny.rr.com writes: > Wait a minute. I thought the whole point of inventing {ce'u} instead of using > {ke'a} was that {ce'u} is never coreferential to other instances of {ce'u}. > Not the *whole* reason -- the boundness is important, too -- but a significant fact. (Actually, the lack of coreference is a result of the boundness.) --part1_5b.1ba1538b.28d1ff34_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/12/2001 11:19:54 PM Central Daylight Time,
rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


Wait a minute. I thought the whole point of inventing {ce'u} instead of using
{ke'a} was that {ce'u} is never coreferential to other instances of {ce'u}.


Not the *whole* reason -- the boundness is important, too -- but a
significant fact.  (Actually, the lack of coreference is a result of the
boundness.) --part1_5b.1ba1538b.28d1ff34_boundary--